https://bio.site/dapurtoto1

https://linkr.bio/dapurtogel

https://heylink.me/dapurtoto88/

https://bio.site/dapurto88

https://potofu.me/dapurtoto88

situs toto

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

toto togel

toto togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

bandar togel

situs togel

toto togel

bo togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

situs togel

situs togel

toto togel

situs toto

situs togel

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

toto togel

situs togel

slot online

Your arrest warrant means nothing to me, Nnamdi Kanu knocks Federal High Court

3 Min Read
IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu

The Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu,  has again berated Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court, Abuja for issuing a bench warrant against him, adding that the Federal  Government could not  incite the world against him.

This was contained in a statement made available to newsmen in Awka, Anambra State,.

Kanu was quoted as saying “The international and diplomatic community would surely ignore the bench warrant.

“I  remain eternally grateful to my sureties for standing by me all through my travails, trials and tribulations.

“It smacks of judicial persecution for Justice Binta Nyako handling my case to claim that my sureties had withdrawn their surety.

“Justice Binta Nyako’s bench warrant against me makes the judiciary complicit in the persecution of innocent people and IPOB since mid 2015.

READ ALSO: PDP decries rising insecurity across the country

“Where a case is for hearing of motion, the trial judge must hear the motion and adjourn for any other process.  On  no account should  they  hear a motion and hear the merits of the matter, not to talk about delivering judgment. The judge  may consider doing that in the very rare circumstance of consent by parties”

“When a matter has been adjourned for a particular purpose, it is my view that the business of the court on the day the matter is adjourned is the purpose for which it was adjourned.

“It is expected that parties have come prepared for that purpose for which the matter was adjourned. If it is expedient to change the purpose, it cannot be done by the court suo motu (on its own)  as the parties must agree.”

He explained that, in March last year a continental human rights court restrained the FG from persecuting  of members of IPOB, regretting that the government  had yet to obey the  order.

Kanu said, “The arrest, detention and murder of IPOB family members is illegal, unconstitutional and in breach of the written laws of Nigeria. The fact that judges and supposed legal practitioners allow this travesty to continue is indicative of the level of ignorance that pervades the Nigerian judiciary.”

Recall that Kanu has been facing trial alongside other IPOB members  over  alleged treason, and he has been away from the court for months after  he was granted  bail.

Justice Nyako  revoked the bail granted Kanu in 2017 and   issued an arrest warrant against him, citing  his  continued absence  from  court.

Share this Article