A recent affidavit, signed and notarized on September 9, 2024, alleges that the Kamala Harris campaign received the debate questions ahead of time. The whistleblower has sworn under penalty of perjury that the Harris campaign was not only given the debate questions but also had input on what could be discussed during the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
The affidavit, submitted in New York, includes multiple layers of verification to support the claims. The deponent confirms that they have personal knowledge of the events outlined in the affidavit. This sworn statement has been prepared in a detailed manner to safeguard the authenticity of the allegations.
Documentation and Verification Measures
To ensure the accuracy and validity of the affidavit, the whistleblower has taken several key steps:
- Certified Letter to Self: The whistleblower sent a certified letter to themselves, postmarked on September 9, 2024, which has been left unopened. This serves as a timestamped record to support future investigations.
- Federal Express Package: An additional Federal Express package containing the affidavit was sent on September 9, 2024, and delivered on September 10. The package remains unopened to preserve the integrity of its contents for any potential investigative purposes.
- Certified Letter to Speaker Mike Johnson: To further establish a timeline, a certified letter was sent to Speaker Mike Johnson on September 9, 2024, ensuring documentation that the claims were formally raised before the debate took place.
- Secretly Recorded Conversations: The affidavit reveals that the whistleblower has secretly recorded several conversations. According to the statement, these recordings will provide evidence that the Harris campaign demanded fact-checking of Trump and outlined specific questions that were not to be asked, allegedly threatening to withdraw from the debate if these conditions were not met.
This affidavit raises serious concerns about the integrity of the debate process and the influence exerted by political campaigns on debate preparations. The next steps remain unclear, but with formal documentation now in place, the whistleblower’s claims are set to prompt further investigation.