https://bio.site/dapurtoto1

https://linkr.bio/dapurtogel

https://heylink.me/dapurtoto88/

https://bio.site/dapurto88

https://potofu.me/dapurtoto88

situs toto

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

toto togel

toto togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

bandar togel

situs togel

toto togel

bo togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

situs togel

situs togel

toto togel

situs toto

situs togel

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

toto togel

situs togel

slot online

Tribunal Upholds David Marks’ Election, Set To Spend 20 Years In Senate

3 Min Read

The National and State Elections Petition Tribunal presided over by Justice Mosunmola Dipeolu has upheld the election of former Senate President, Senator David Mark.

Justice Dipeolu who dismissed the petition brought by Daniel Onjeh of the All Progressives Congress (APC) against David Mark held that the petitioner (Onjeh) failed on the burden of prove to substantially proof that the senatorial election in Benue South district did not compile with the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.

Onjeh is contesting that the re-election of Mark was marred by irregularities such as ballot stuffing, manipulation of votes, inducement, falsification of results, abuse of office, over-voting as well as mutilation of results sheets.

Justice Dipeolu disagreed with the petitioner, arguing that the evidence of his witnesses were contradictory as they were based on hearsay which is not admissible in law.

“Witnesses contradicted their statement in admitting that the election held free and fair in their polling units. Their evidence is based on hearsay.”

The tribunal, while noting that the documentary as well as oral evidence did not show that the election was fraudulent held that the people who tendered the documents were not the makers, stressing that the documents were tendered without linking them to the petitioner.

“The petitioner and his witnesses did not link documents to the case. They did not show figures to prove non compliance. He did not prove that non compliance affected the result of the election. Ballot boxes and papers should have been brought to court to prove the case beyond reasonable doubts. Issue of falsification should have been made by the polling agents even as the petitioner did not produce or invite anyone who alleged harassment or intimidation.

“Their evidence is based on the hearsay including that of the data analyst who admitted that his report was erroneous. Based on all these, I hold that the petitioner failed to prove that the election was not held in substantially compliance with the electoral act and the petition fails and is accordingly dismissed”, Justice Dipeolu maintained.

TAGGED: ,
Share this Article