https://bio.site/dapurtoto1

https://linkr.bio/dapurtogel

https://heylink.me/dapurtoto88/

https://bio.site/dapurto88

https://potofu.me/dapurtoto88

situs toto

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

toto togel

toto togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

bandar togel

situs togel

toto togel

bo togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

situs togel

situs togel

toto togel

situs toto

situs togel

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

toto togel

situs togel

slot online

President Zuma ‘disappointed’ by court Apex court ruling on corruption charges

3 Min Read

President Jacob Zuma of South Africa said on Friday he was “disappointed” by a Supreme Court of Appeal decision to uphold a High Court ruling to reinstate 783 corruption charges filed against him before he became president.

In a statement from his office, Zuma said he now expects the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to consider representations on the case before making decision to prosecute him.

The statement did not spell out the representations.

South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal on Friday upheld a High Court ruling to reinstate hundreds of corruption charges filed against Jacob Zuma before he became president.

 

 

State prosecutors set aside the charges in April 2009, paving the way for Zuma, who has faced and denied numerous corruption allegations made since then, to run for president later that year.

Zuma and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) were appealing against the High Court ruling, made in April 2016.

In his decision to reject their appeal, Judge Lorimer Leach said it was “irrational” for the NPA to have set the charges aside.

The NPA has responsibility for deciding whether to reinstate the charges, which relate to a 30 billion rand (2 billion dollars) government arms deal arranged in the late 1990s.

It was unclear when such a decision might be taken.

 

 

It was also not immediately clear if Zuma would approach the Constitutional Court to try to set aside the Supreme Court’s ruling.

The NPA would need to consider the judgment, spokesman Luvuyo Mfaku said, adding it would “at all times do the right thing within the confines of the rule of law and in the interest of proper administration of justice.”

The rand extended gains against the dollar after the Supreme Court’s ruling, which was unanimous.

“It is difficult to understand why the present regime at the NPA considered that the decision to terminate the prosecution could be defended,” Judge Leach said.

The focus of the corruption allegations that Zuma has faced since taking office has been on leaked emails pointing to the Gupta family, business friends of the president, using their influence to secure lucrative state contracts for their companies.

Zuma and the Guptas have consistently denied wrongdoing. (Reuters/NAN)
FAT/SH

TAGGED: , , ,
Share this Article