https://bio.site/dapurtoto1

https://linkr.bio/dapurtogel

https://heylink.me/dapurtoto88/

https://bio.site/dapurto88

https://potofu.me/dapurtoto88

situs toto

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

toto togel

toto togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

bandar togel

situs togel

toto togel

bo togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

situs togel

situs togel

toto togel

situs toto

situs togel

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

toto togel

situs togel

slot online

Dudafa’s alleged N1.6bn fraud: Witness gives evidence on accounts’ transactions

4 Min Read
EFCC Arraigns Man for Moving N15m From Company Account

A Prosecution Witness, Mr Ademola Folorunsho, on Monday told a Federal High Court, Lagos, that due diligence was observed in the opening of accounts linked to former presidential aide, Waripamo Dudafa, charged with N1.6 billion fraud.

Dudafa, an ex aide to former President Goodluck Jonathan, is charged alongside one Iwejuo Nna, on charges bordering on N1.6 billion fraud.

The EFCC said the accused committed the offences on June 11, 2013.

The Prosecution closed its case on March 16, but the accused opted to make a no-case submission in its defence and urged the court to dismiss the case, on the grounds that the prosecution failed to establish any case against them.

Justice Mohammed Idris in a ruling delivered in August, dismissed the no case submission of the accused, and ordered them to open their defence.

The defence had since opened its case, after which the court adjourned for adoption of final written addresses.

Meanwhile, following an amendment of the charge, the accused were re-arraigned on Nov. 12, while the defence opted to recall some witnesses.

On Monday, the witness, a staff of Heritage Bank, told the court that his bank followed due process in the opening and operations of the accounts of companies linked to Dudafa.

The companies are: Seagate Property Development & Investment Ltd, Avalon Global Property Development Company Ltd and Pluto Property Ltd, Investment Company Ltd, Rotato Interlink Services Ltd, and Ebiwise Ltd.

Under cross examination by Mr Kolawole Salami, who was holding the brief of Mr Gboyega Oyewole (SAN), the witness told the court that all the transactions carried out in the accounts of the companies were by electronic transfers and not by cash.

When shown exhibits such as A and B, the witness confirmed to the court that the transactions as can be seen from the exhibits before him, are electronic transactions.

The witness also confirmed that Dudafa’s name did not appear as a recipient of any money from the statement of accounts of the companies.

Late Nigerian OAP, Tosyn Bucknor for Burial November 28

Under cross examination by the second defence counsel, Mr Ige Asemudara, the witness said that the companies’ accounts were not concealed from the bank management, or any regulatory authority.

He admitted that as Operations Manager, no transaction could go on in his branch without his knowledge, adding that all the documents required for the opening and operations of the accounts were duly provided by the owners.

When asked by Asemudara if he was aware of the BVN policy of the Federal Government, he replied that he could not state categorically when the policy was made compulsory, but said that the BVN in the accounts did not have any link with the second accused.

According to him, the major beneficiaries of the cash from the accounts were signatories to the accounts, who are also directors of the companies and not Dudafa.

Justice Idris has adjourned until Nov. 29, for continuation of trial.

Dudafa and Iwejuo are standing trial over allegations of conspiring to conceal proceeds of crime.

They were on June 11, 2016, arraigned by the EFCC on a 23-count charge of conspiracy to conceal proceeds of crime amounting to N1.6 billion.

In the charge, the anti-graft agency alleged that the accused between June 2013 and June 2015, used different companies to fraudulently launder the money.

The offences contravene the provisions of Sections 17(a), 18(c), and 27 (3) (c) of the EFCC (Establishment) Act, 2004.

 

TAGGED: , , ,
Share this Article