https://bio.site/dapurtoto1

https://linkr.bio/dapurtogel

https://heylink.me/dapurtoto88/

https://bio.site/dapurto88

https://potofu.me/dapurtoto88

situs toto

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

toto togel

toto togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

bandar togel

situs togel

toto togel

bo togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

situs togel

situs togel

toto togel

situs toto

situs togel

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

toto togel

situs togel

slot online

Australia Asks China To Explain ‘Economic Coercion’ Threat In Coronavirus Row

3 Min Read

Australia has asked the Chinese ambassador to explain his “threats of economic coercion” in response to Canberra’s push for an international inquiry into the source and spread of the coronavirus.

SEE ALSO: ECOWAS Supports Debt Cancellation, Plans Post-Pandemic Economic Policies

Australia’s call for a probe into the pandemic, which originated in the central Chinese city of Wuhan in December, has angered China, its largest trading partner, following a couple of years of diplomatic tension.

Cheng Jingye, Beijing’s ambassador to Australia, told a newspaper on Monday that Chinese consumers could boycott Australian beef, wine, tourism and universities in response.

Australian Trade Minister, Simon Birmingham, said Australia was a “crucial supplier” to China and that Australia’s resources and energy helped power much of China’s manufacturing growth and construction.

He said Cheng had been called by the secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to explain his comments.

“Australia is no more going to change its policy position on major public health issues because of economic coercion, or threats of economic coercion, than we would change our policy position in matters of national security,” Birmingham said.

The Chinese embassy published a summary of the conversation on its website, which said Cheng had “flatly rejected the concern expressed from the Australian side”.

Cheng also said “the fact cannot be buried that the proposal is a political manoeuvre,” according to the statement.

It added that Australia was “crying up wine and selling vinegar” when it said the proposed review would not target China.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, Geng Shuang, denied the ambassador’s comments amounted to “economic coercion”.

“The Chinese ambassador to Australia is talking about the concerns of the Chinese people, who … disapprove of certain wrong actions by Australia lately,” Geng said in Beijing.

Birmingham said the Australian “government’s displeasure was made known” in the phone call.

China accounts for 26 per cent of Australia’s total trade, worth around 150 billion dollars (A$235 billion) in 2018/19.

Also,it is the biggest single market for Australian exports such as coal, iron ore, wine, beef, tourism and education.

Birmingham said Australia wanted to maintain a positive relationship with China, but would also seek other opportunities in places such as India and the EU.

Trade with the EU was worth A$114.3 billion and India A$30.3 billion in 2018/19.

Even amid escalating diplomatic tensions in 2018/19 when Australia introduced foreign interference laws perceived to be aimed at China, two-way trade with China grew by 20 per cent.

“China needs us. Let’s not forget that. Many of the critical imports to Chinese industries like iron ore, coal, and gas come from Australia,” James Paterson, a member of the ruling Liberal Party, said.

Share this Article