https://bio.site/dapurtoto1

https://linkr.bio/dapurtogel

https://heylink.me/dapurtoto88/

https://bio.site/dapurto88

https://potofu.me/dapurtoto88

situs toto

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

toto togel

toto togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

bo togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

situs togel

situs togel

toto togel

situs toto

https://rejoasri-desa.id

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

toto togel

situs togel

Alleged N3.5bn fraud: Absence of judge stalls Saraki’s aide trial

2 Min Read

Absence of Justice Babs Kuewumi, on Tuesday stalled continuation of trial of Gbenga Makanjuola, an aide to Senate President, Bukola Saraki,  charged with N3.5 billion fraud.

Continuation of trial could not hold on Tuesday before a Federal High Court in Lagos as earlier scheduled because Kuewumi was away on an official duty.

The court consequently adjourned the hearing until Jan. 10, 2019.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) preferred an 11-count fraud charge against Makanjuola, a Deputy Chief of Staff to Saraki, Melrose General Services Ltd, Obiorah Amobi, (operations Manager at Melrose).

Also charged are Kolawole Shittu, (a cashier) and Robert Chidozie, who is said to be “at large’’.

The accused, however, pleaded not guilty to the charges, and were admitted to bails in the sum of N250 million each with sureties in like sums.

In the charge, the accused were alleged to have committed the offence in December 2016.

They were accused of conspiring to disguise the unlawful origin of the sum of N3.5 billion paid into the account of Melrose.

According to the prosecution, the accused took control of the sum which was transferred from the Nigeria Governors Forum’s account, into an Access Bank account operated by Melrose.

The prosecution said that the accused ought to have known that the sum represented proceeds of unlawful activities.

The offence contravened the provisions of sections 15, 15 (2), 15 (3), 18, and 18 (a) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Amendment Act 2011. (NAN)

Share this Article