toto slot

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

situs togel terpercaya

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

toto togel

toto togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs toto

bo togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs togel

situs toto

situs toto

https://rejoasri-desa.id

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

RTP SLOT MAXWIN

https://ikpmbanyumas.org/

Makinde: PDP cautions CJN over comments on party’s internal affairs

5 Min Read

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has cautioned Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Olukayode Ariwoola over his comment on Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde’s membership of the G5 also known as the integrity governors.

Speaking during a banquet held in his honour by the Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike, in Port Harcourt on Thursday night, the CJN said he was happy that Makinde, who is his kinsman, belongs to the group.

The Integrity governors comprise Wike, Makinde, Governor Samuel Ortom of Benue, Governor Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia, and Governor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi of Enugu.

The governors, who are members of the PDP, are calling for equity, fairness and justice in the PDP, specifically insisting that the party’s national chairman, Senator Iyorcha Ayu, must step down to pave the way for someone from the South to succeed him, since the party’s presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, hails from the North.

Ariwoola’s comment has continued to generate controversy.

In a reaction on Saturday through its National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, the PDP expressed concern over the CJN’s comment, saying it amounted to dabbling into the internal affairs of the party.

Read Also: 2023 presidential race would’ve been boring without Tinubu – Shehu Sani

The main opposition party said that while it has utmost respect for the institution of the judiciary and judicial officers, it “rejects any action or utterance by any Judicial Officer, let alone the CJN, that undermines the integrity of the Judiciary.

“By delving into the internal affairs of the PDP at a public event in Port Harcourt, Rivers State on Thursday, November 24, 2022 where he was reported to have made reference to the political activities of some PDP governors, which comment is viewed to be encouraging division in our Party, the PDP posits that the CJN’s action is unacceptable and inconsistent with his status as the head of the Judicial arm of government.

“Our Party is worried that such partisan comment by the CJN is in violation of his Oath of Office as the head of the country’s Judicial arm which is expected to be impartial and non-partisan.

“Irrespective of the circumstance or situation, the CJN is expected to be circumspect at all times and avoid partisan actions and utterances that are likely to erode the institutional integrity of the Judiciary and bring it to disrepute especially as the nation prepares for the 2023 general elections.

“In a Federal Republic such as Nigeria, with  a Constitutional Separation of Powers, the Judiciary is entrusted with the responsibility of interpretation of the laws and as such should be seen to be neutral at all times and endeavour to interpret and review the laws in the context of the case and controversy of the parties before it.

“Nigerians expect the CJN, with his experience, to be in a position to advice, rebuke and punish members of the Judicial arm who get entangled in the political arena.

“The fact that the CJN himself is the one reportedly violating this critical ethic of neutrality, fairness and respect for the Oath of Office for Judicial Officers raises serious concern in our polity.

“The question is, how do Nigerians and especially the PDP trust that the CJN will be an even-handed arbiter in any case or matter relating to internal issues in our Party or those connected to other political parties?

“It is instructive to note that the test for a Judge to recuse himself from a matter is the “likelihood of bias” and the CJN is expected to be mindful of that test in his public engagements.”

TAGGED: , ,
Share this Article