toto slot

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

link togel

situs toto

situs togel terpercaya

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

bo togel terpercaya

bo togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs toto

https://rejoasri-desa.id

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

RTP SLOT MAXWIN

Fraud scandal: Oando share price suffers another loss

2 Min Read

The scandal rocking Oando Plc has again caused a 3.85% dip in its share price at the close of trading on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) on Monday.

The decline came the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) suspended the firm’s annual shareholder meeting.

The SEC had on Monday morning directed Oando to suspend its Annual General Meeting slated for Tuesday (today).

The statement read, “The Securities and Exchange Commission hereby notifies the public that further to the ex-parte order of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi Lagos in Suit No: FHC/L/CS/910/19 IN Mr Jubril Adewale Tinubu & Anor V Securities and Exchange Commision & Anor, the Annual General Meeting of Oando Plc (a company listed on the Nigerian and Johannesburg Stock Exchanges) scheduled to hold on Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 10:00am has been suspended till further notice.

“Accordingly, the commission has directed the suspension of the Annual General Meeting of Oando Plc to allow the parties maintain status quo.”

READ ALSO: Traditional ruler turns palace to Clinic to save women, children in Kaduna

The commission said it would update relevant stakeholders and the public on the outcome of the ongoing litigation.

Oando’s woes started on May 31 when the SEC ordered the oil company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Wale Tinubu, and other affected board members to resign. But the company immediately replied, saying the alleged infractions and penalties were unsubstantiated, ultra vires, invalid and calculated to prejudice the business of the company.

The company had protested that it had not been given the opportunity to see, review and respond to the forensic audit report and so was unable to ascertain what findings (if any) were made in relation to the alleged infractions and defend itself accordingly before the SEC.

Share this Article