toto slot

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

link togel

situs toto

situs togel terpercaya

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

bo togel terpercaya

bo togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs toto

https://rejoasri-desa.id

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

RTP SLOT MAXWIN

How Police, Army, Others Can Avoid Amnesty’s Criticisms – Shehu Sani

2 Min Read
Sen. Shehu Sani

The senator representing Kaduna Central senatorial district, Sen. Shehu Sani, has listed ways Nigeria’s security and defence forces can avoid constant criticisms from international human rights organisations such as Amnesty International.

Amnesty International recently condemned the suspension of operations of the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) in the North East, after the Army accused UNICEF workers of spying and collaborating with Boko Haram terrorists.

Amnesty international had in May accused Army personnel of abusing female internally displaced persons (IDPs), a claim the Army strenuously denied.

The group also accused the army of shooting members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN) without provocation in October.

But Sani, a civil and pro-democracy activist, has identified ways the Army and others can improve on their negative perception by international rights groups.

Furthermore, Sani berated government officials for their quickness to dismiss reports by Amnesty and similar organisations.

Taking to his verified Twitter handle, Sani said, “If our security and defence forces will respect fundamental rights, treat peaceful protesters with civility, observe and respect the rules of engagement, protect civilians, avoid unlawful arrests and desist from extra judicial killings, Amnesty Nigeria will have nothing to write or report.

“When people are in power, it’s the trend for many of them and their supporters to denounce human rights groups as irritating foes or nauseating felons; When they are out of power, those groups end up as their only protection in the likelihood of vengeance, vindictiveness or vendetta.”

See tweets:

Share this Article