toto slot

toto togel 4d

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs toto

situs togel terpercaya

bandar togel online

10 situs togel terpercaya

toto togel

toto togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs togel

situs toto

bo togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

10 situs togel terpercaya

situs togel

situs togel

situs toto

situs toto

https://rejoasri-desa.id

https://www.eksplorasilea.com/

https://ukinvestorshow.com

https://advisorfinancialservices.com

https://milky-holmes-unit.com

RTP SLOT MAXWIN

https://ikpmbanyumas.org/

Femi Fani Kayode loses bid to transfer case to Abuja

5 Min Read
Fani-Kayode

Fani -Kayode, Director of Media and Publicity in the campaign organisation of ex-president Goodluck Jonathan, who is being tried for an alleged fraud of N4.9bn, has lost the bid to have the case transferred from Lagos to Abuja.

Justice Rilwan Aikawa, of the Federal High Court in Lagos in a ruling on Tuesday dismissed Fani-Kayode’s transfer application for lacking merit and having no jurisdiction for transfer to Abuja.

The EFCC had accused the former aviation minister of diverting N26m allegedly received from the office of the National Security Adviser, while Sambo was in Office and using the funds without going through the financial institution as required under the Money Laundering Act.

Fani Kayode is also facing 17 counts of money laundering before the Lagos Division of the court along with former finance minister, Nenadi Unman, Danjuma Yusuf and a firm, Joint Trust Dimension Night. Ltd for an alleged case of unlawful retention, use and payment of money to the tune of N4.9bn.

Contrary to arguments by Fani-Kayode’s lawyer, Mr. Norrison Quakers (SAN), that the cause of action leading to the case took place in Abuja, the judge observed that parts of the alleged illegal transactions by Fani-Kayode leading to the charge took place in Lagos.

Justice Aikawa noted, for instance, the allegation by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission that Fani-Kayode paid N30m cash to a printer, Olusegun Idowu, whose office is at Igbosere on Lagos Island.

Besides, the judge noted that based on Fani-Kayode’s request, the immediate-past Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta, had earlier transferred the case from Justice Muslim Hassan of the same court to the present judge, who is also in Lagos.

Justice Aikawa held that if the CJ had found merit in the request to transfer the case from Lagos to Abuja, he would have done it after Justice Hassan withdrew from the case rather than transfer it to another judge in Lagos.

Justice Aikawa held, “I am of the view that based on the facts and circumstances of this case, there is no justification for the transfer of this case to Abuja. The application lacks merit and is hereby dismissed.”

Fani-Kayode’s lawyer, Quakers, had argued that the facts of the case showed that all the transactions which his client carried out as the Director of Media and Publicity of the Goodluck Jonathan Campaign Organisation, for which he was charged, took place in Abuja.

Quakers, however, argued that Fani-Kayode was based in Abuja and had another fraud trial there, urging the court to transfer the case to Abuja for convenience.

But in opposition to Quakers, the EFCC lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, maintained that Fani-Kayode should be tried in Lagos because the instruments of the alleged illegal transactions for which he was being tried, including cheques and receipts, “were recovered in Lagos.”

“The financial institutions used in the transactions have their head offices in Lagos,” Oyedepo argued.

He also pointed out to the judge that 13 out of the prosecution’s 17 witnesses live in Lagos, adding that Fani-Kayode’s application was a mere ploy to frustrate the case.

Oyedepo informed Justice Aikawa that Fani-Kayode had earlier raised the same issue before Justice Hassan, to whom the case was first assigned.

He said after Justice Hassan withdrew from the case based on Fani-Kayode’s claim that he would not get justice before the judge, the then CJ, Justice Auta, did not transfer the case to Abuja but re-assigned it to Justice Aikawa of the same court.

“The consequence of the alleged offence of money laundering is not limited to Abuja, but to the entire federation,” Oyedepo said.

Justice Aikawa, in his ruling on Tuesday, upheld the arguments of the EFCC lawyer.

The case was adjourned till Wednesday for continuation of trial.

Share this Article